Ru Sci-fi Форум Бориса и Аркадия Стругацких  
 - Начало - Регистрация - Ответить - Поиск - Статистика - Опросы -  - Правила форума
abs.rusfforum.org / "Foreign Office" / G.Winslow-Yost. In the Zone of Alienation: Tarkovsky as Video Game.//The New York Review of Books, 01.05.2012
Автор Сообщение
Роман

Участник
# Дата: 9 Май 2012 12:09
Ответить 


In the Zone of Alienation: Tarkovsky as Video Game


The New York Review of Books, Blog, May 1, 2012, 12:55 p.m.

Gabriel Winslow-Yost


Jean Gaumy/Magnum Photos. Pripyat, the abandoned city in the "zone of alienation" near Chernobyl, Ukraine, May-June 2008

Zona, Geoff Dyer's recent book about Andrei Tarkovsky's masterpiece Stalker, has been much discussed for its almost comically thorough dissection of the stately 1979 film. In an account that combines summary, memoir, meditation, tribute, and citation into a kind of deluxe version of the TV recap, Dyer sets out to convey the hypnotic effect Stalker has had on decades of viewers, and on himself. And yet, after reading the book, I was left feeling that something was missing. In both the book and the deluge of Stalker coverage its release has occasioned, perhaps the most crucial, and most popular, part of the film's afterlife has gone entirely unremarked: the video game version.

It may at first seem improbable that a decades-old art film in which very little happens could be embellished with firefights and mutant psychics and converted into a violent action game. Adapted from a popular Russian science fiction novel, Stalker depicts three men ("Writer," "Professor," and "Stalker," their guide and the film's protagonist) journeying into a mysterious, dangerous "Zone," which supposedly contains "the Room," capable of granting wishes. This fraught, high-stakes quest consists mainly of the three men walking a couple hundred yards in a grassy, abandoned landscape and talking (with a break for a nap); the film ends after 163 minutes with no wishes apparently made or granted.

But one aspect of Stalker's enduring fascination has been the way it seems to prefigure the Chernobyl disaster that occurred seven years after its release: the nuclear meltdown created an abandoned, radioactive "zone of alienation"—over a thousand square miles considered too radioactive to enter, though tourists began to be allowed in last year — that to many was eerily similar to the Zone of the film. It is this parallel that inspired a Ukrainian video game developer named GSC Game World to create a series of first-person shooter game adaptations of the film called, respectively, S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl, S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Clear Sky, and S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Pripyat (Pripyat is the name of the abandoned city built to house Chernobyl workers). The different "levels" or settings in the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. games are detailed (though thoroughly fictionalized) recreations of Pripyat, the cordon itself, and so on. Released between 2007 and 2010, the games have been absurdly successful; Shadow of Chernobyl alone sold several million copies around the world (and, bringing the cycle of adaptation full circle, a series of novelizations based on the game were released in Russia).


GSC Game World. A still from the video game S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

On the face of it, the games don't have much in common with the film. A large part of the genius of Tarkovsky's Stalker was its singular combination of mystical yearning and artistic precision. The actors, even in the midst of weighty metaphysical discussions, always seem like real people, dirty, contradictory, and changeable. Stalker is all anxious faith. The Zone is, he says, the only place he feels at home, and he knows its dangers enough to fear them utterly. Professor moves from phlegmatic commonsense to righteous violence, threatening near the end of the film to destroy the Room with a homemade bomb. While Writer, for his part, begins the film drunk and foolhardy, attempting to bring a floozy along on the expedition, and ends it in anguished, self-loathing sanity. As they move from the grimy city on the edge of the Zone to the verdant Zone itself, the cinematography switches carefully from a rough-hewn sepia to gorgeous, almost overwhelmingly lush color (Tarkovsky sometimes painted the leaves of trees to make them properly green). The soundtrack slides back and forth between an unsettling electronic score and natural sounds, often combining both.

None of this cinematic intensity or psychological depth remains in the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. games, which have subpar graphics, horrid writing, abysmal voice-acting, tasteless menus, and tediously clichéd music. Tarkovsky's enigmatic title has been turned into a ridiculous acronym ("Scavenger, Trespasser, Adventurer, Loner, Killer, Explorer, Robber,") and the series is ridden with technical glitches, even after a host of corrective delays and patches.

But it doesn't really matter. As games, the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. series are remarkable, the first one especially so (few have much cared for Clear Sky). While they all have the elements of a standard action game—guns, monsters, missions, traps, loot—much of the player's activity is oddly in keeping with Stalker's spirit, sometimes even managing to expand upon it. Each game has an overarching plot—you're a stranded soldier, or an amnesiac with a mission tattooed on your arm—but these are largely beside the point. The focus of the action is simply exploring: skirting battles or fighting in them, completing optional missions from other Zone residents, hunting for hidden treasure.

The Zone in the video games is a beautifully dangerous place, bigger and grimmer than Tarkovsky's, but somehow still appropriate. There are plenty of long, tense walks through damp weather or empty, creaking tunnels. Packs of dogs wander the landscape, ruined farmhouses give shelter from the rain; here and there the ground ripples strangely. Stalkers gather around campfires, bandits take potshots at passersby, and a man lies wounded in a ditch, begging for help. Watching Stalker, one is occasionally brought up short by remembering that it was not filmed in Chernobyl, so perfect an analogue does that event seem for the film's images of technology and nature, beauty and danger in strange alliance. The games, at their best, can seem like a sort of miracle: a dead man's masterpiece, come home at last.


Andrei Tarkovsky. A character in Andrei Tarkovsky's Stalker inside the Zone.

Yet there is something deeper that sets the series apart. Most video games are designed to unfold entirely around you, the player: everything happens for your benefit; you're always coming into a room at the most dramatic moment, and only you can complete the mission. In many, if you simply don't move for a few minutes, the entire world comes to a standstill. The signal new feature of the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. games, in contrast—the source at once of all those delays and bugs, and much of their unique power—was something called "A-Life," an elaborate artificial intelligence system that populated the world with thousands of creatures and people who go about their business with no special regard for the player's actions.

A-Life doesn't really care about you; events take place, whether you see them or not. You'll spend half an hour defending a friendly group from bandits, only to come back later and find they were overrun by a later attack; or you'll accept a mission to kill a misbehaving stalker, only to find he's been killed by a wild dog a mile away. These events—and many more that you may never find out about—emerge from the complex set of goals (find treasure, for instance, or sleep) and behaviors (shoot, trade, wander aimlessly) that A-Life provides for every character and creature throughout the game.

In some ways, the video games are closer to Tarkovsky's source material than to Tarkovsky. In the Strugatsky brothers' Roadside Picnic, the science fiction book on which the movie is loosely based, the stalkers are numerous and mercenary. The elements of the Zone are many, and named, if not quite explained—there's "Mosquito Mange" and "Burning Fluff," "Full Empties" and "Black Sprays." In the film most of these are not present—Tarkovsky leaves in only one, the "meatgrinder," though his Stalker is clearly terrified of many more. But the video game returns them, and adds more: strange traps known as "anomalies," that crush, dismember, and electrocute; and "artifacts," weird little objects with supernatural properties—infinite batteries, death rays, and so on—which are the reason people venture into the Zone. (In Roadside Picnic both the anomalies and the "artifacts" are discarded alien technology; in the games they are somehow the result of the nuclear meltdown.)


GSC Game World. A still from the game S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

One of the lasting enigmas of Tarkovsky's film is the odd, intense expression—at once consumed with worry and lit up like a child's, or a fanatic's—worn by the actor who plays Stalker. After playing the video game, it suddenly makes a new kind of sense: It's your face, rapt in front of a screen, playing. The games' first-person perspective and open-ended structure have a similar effect. You can go more or less where you want, provided you don't get poisoned by radiation, shot by bandits, or mauled by mutant dogs on the way; it's just you and your gun, and no one, not even the game, seems to care what happens to you. Eventually the silly central plot kicks in and all this goes by the wayside, but until then, the game's indifference can seem a kind of grim, bracing rejoinder to the smug exceptionalism that defines American games: in S.T.A.L.K.E.R. you aren't special, you're just there.

Роман

Участник
# Дата: 9 Май 2012 12:26
Ответить 


User comments

Цитата: Bruno de Figueiredo
I fail to see any reasonable comparison between a film that will haunt any able viewer for an entire lifetime and a series of games in which the only meaningful interaction between the player and the open level essentially consists of firing rounds of ammunition towards something or someone.

If anything, the mere mention of Tarkovsky's masterpiece - or Roadside Picnic for that same effect - is the worst conceivable way of introducing an article trying to bring out the best from a group of first person shooters whose greatest achievement is later summarized, what apology, in a single anticlimactic sentence: S.T.A.L.K.E.R. games are not as incoherent as most North-American productions.

I say it was a perfect waste of very good prose.


Цитата: Robin Ottens
Nah, it's not. The stalker games offer more interaction than just shooting at people. You know, sitting by a campfire listening to a fellow stalker play the guitar. Exploring and finding safe routes through the deceptively beautiful landscapes and abandoned cities as you watch your food supplies slowly dwindle. Trading goods and supplies or talking about recent events with the inhabitants of the zone.

I've had more meditative, peaceful and contemplative moments happen to me in the stalker games than both the short story and film contained. Surrounded by occasional silliness and stupid game writing of course. But it's perfectly fine to mention Tarkovsky's movie and the novel it was all based on in the same sentence as the GDC Gameworlds' stalker games.


Цитата: Vano
Have you actually played the games or is this just snobbery talking? The S.T.A.L.K.E.R. games are masterpieces, but sadly not everyone is capable of appreciating them.


Цитата: colbyj
It seems a bit weird that The New York Review of Books would choose to start with a comparison STALKER to the movie, rather than to to the book, Roadside Picnic. For one, STALKER has way more in common to Roadside Picnic than to the movie, and also, Roadside Picnic was recently re-translated to English. Nonetheless, it was still an interesting article.


Цитата: Andy Sixtyten
I attended a reading of Zona with Geoff Dyer just as the book was published and asked him about the video game version. He was aware of it, but felt that it added little to the magic/mystery/vision of the film. He raised the interesting point that one of the amazing things about "the zone" in the film, is that you could actually visit it if you wished, because it was a real place and also constantly changing/evolving, which you could never do in a video game with it's defined rules and programming.

His love is with the film and not necessarily the "universe" that surrounds it. Also he is not part of a generation raised on video games as part of their entertainment and is unfamiliar with their potential for storytelling.

I think that Zona is a great book and Dyer's passion for the film is infectious - but it's good that other people are just as passionate about the game it influenced.


Цитата: Christian Dannie Storgaard
Just a small correction: "Defined rules and programming" is not just what defines computer games, but also everything else in this universe. Games can be created - and have already - to incorporate evolution and mutation, so if someone wanted to create a version of the zone that was ever changing, they certainly could. Though only through its inhabitants, even S.T.A.L.K.E.R.'s zone evolves.


Цитата: neut
"He raised the interesting point that one of the amazing things about "the zone" in the film, is that you could actually visit it if you wished, because it was a real place and also constantly changing/evolving"
It's interesting that he says this as for me the entire appeal of the Stalker games was the Zone as a place you could visit which constantly changed and evolved.


Цитата: I've only played the first game in the series, but to this day it remains one of my favorite "virtual reality" experiences, in that you really feel you are part of the grim world it depicts. If any of you wish to check out the game, the mod "S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Redux" is essential to getting the most out of it.
I've only played the first game in the series, but to this day it remains one of my favorite "virtual reality" experiences, in that you really feel you are part of the grim world it depicts. If any of you wish to check out the game, the mod "S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Redux" is essential to getting the most out of it.


Цитата: Emiliano De Santis
How aproppriate to visit this topic just when STALKER 2 has been officially cancelled, allegedly due to lack of investors...


Цитата: Gabor B
Great conclusion. There's a critically acclaimed English novelization series too, consisting of two books already. Would have been fun to read about this book to film to video game to book circle.


Цитата: Tom Kummer
The zone of alienation around Chernobyl is a very special place.
Abandoned by humans in a rush and left on its own decay for nearly three decades.
The scenery of the ghost city Prypjat would be a impressive setting for films and games. Actually I'm wondering why there are not more games and movies produced with Prypjat or the Exclusion Zone as subject or atmosphere.
Looking at still images from this very place gives one so many different emotions at the same time. Emotions ranging from sadness and fear to a attracting fascination and the (maybe strange) wish to explore every room in those abandoned buildings.

A non-gamificated and non-fiction journey in photographs to Prypjat and the Zone around Chernobyl can be found here:


Цитата: Yeould
"the game's indifference can seem a kind of grim, bracing rejoinder to the smug exceptionalism that defines American games: inS.T.A.L.K.E.R. you aren't special, you're just there."
Yes!! So very well said. This is exactly why it's such a fantastic game (the first one, that is). It's that "you aren't Special" vibe that makes the game so immersive, and unlike anything else. Fantastic article for this and many other reasons, really enjoyed reading it!

PS: There are in fact numerous fan-made patches that fix the majority of the game's technical issues and improve the graphics considerably. For me though, the game's original sketchy presentation was kind of part of its charm-- the technical issues being rather consistent with the game's atmosphere. It's the one game i could forgive for being buggy, i'll put it that way.


Начало -
Ваш ответ
Bold Style  Italic Style  Underlined Style  Image Link  URL Link  Insert YouTube video  Empty quote 
:) ;) :-p :-( Ещё смайлики...  Отключить смайлики в сообщении
#610B38 #DF0101 #8A4B08 #FF8000 #0B610B
#01DF01 #01DFD7 #08088A #2E2EFE #7401DF
#DF01D7 #585858 #BDBDBD #D0A9F5 #A9D0F5
Ochrana proti spamu. Napi№te prosнm инslici иtyшi:

» Логин  » Пароль 
Только зарегистрированные пользователи могут здесь постить. Авторизуйтесь для отправки сообщений, или зарегистрируйтесь сейчас.

 
На форуме: Гостей - 1
Участников - 0
Рекорд одновременно присутствующих на форуме, Всего: 251 [23 Янв 2017 05:48]
Гостей - 251 / Участников - 0


Поддержка: miniBB™ © 2001-2018